<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Upheaval &#187; SQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://upheaval.net/tag/sql/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://upheaval.net</link>
	<description>The digital domain of Nathan Stambro</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SQL: &#8220;Sequel&#8221; or &#8220;S-Q-L&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://upheaval.net/2009/02/sql-sequel-or-s-q-l/</link>
		<comments>http://upheaval.net/2009/02/sql-sequel-or-s-q-l/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Stambro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SQL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upheaval.net/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SQL is officially pronounced &#8220;S-Q-L&#8221; but I still prefer &#8220;Sequel&#8221;.  The reason?  2 syllables versus 3 syllables.  It is just quicker and easier to say &#8220;Sequel&#8221; than it is to verbally spell out &#8220;S-Q-L&#8221;.  Plus, I think it makes conversations about SQL flow a little better.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SQL is <a title="SQL" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL">officially</a> pronounced &#8220;S-Q-L&#8221; but I still prefer &#8220;Sequel&#8221;.  The reason?  2 syllables versus 3 syllables.  It is just quicker and easier to say &#8220;Sequel&#8221; than it is to verbally spell out &#8220;S-Q-L&#8221;.  Plus, I think it makes conversations about SQL flow a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://upheaval.net/2009/02/sql-sequel-or-s-q-l/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

