Anyway, the reason why these two render the fonts the way they do has already been discussed to death so I won’t go into that.  Ultimately though, it helped me to understand something about myself when it comes to Web Design that I always thought was kind of odd…

For some reason, I’ve always had an easier time doing graphic design on my Mac but writing code has always been easier on a PC.  Even though Photoshop is almost exactly the same on Microsoft’s Windows and Apple’s OSX operating systems, I’m more inspired and can knock out graphics quicker on the Mac.  Even though Dreamweaver is pretty much the same on both, I can knock out code quicker on the PC.  I’ve always suspected it was the way the fonts displayed on the different operating systems, but after reading up on why they two render fonts the way they do, now I’m certain that is definitely the reason.

Now that Macs can run Windows as well as OSX, I’m planning to go back to just using Macs, although my G4 won’t do it since it has to be an Intel-based Mac so I have to buy a new one.  This is mostly because I’m just tired of having to reinstall Windows on my computers every couple of years and all the other problems I’ve had with Windows and PC hardware.  I’ve never felt like I needed to reinstall OSX on my Macs ever and I’ve hardly had any hardware issues.

Anyway, does anyone know if Boot Camp or Parallels render screen fonts the Mac way when you’re running Windows or does it keep it the Windows way?  I’m going to have to find that out before I go back to the Macs.  I use Visual Studio 2005 these days but I guess if Boot Camp or Parallels render the fonts in Windows apps the Apple way, then I may have to rethink that plan.